EB004 Assignment Competency part 2 Evidence-based Best Practices

Order ready-to-submit essays — 100% plagiarism-free guaranteed!

Note: Our papers are 100% human-written. 

Student name

Walden University

EB004

Professor Name

Submission Date

Part 2 Evidence-Based Best Practices

The anxiety disorders are some of the most prevalent mental health problems in the globe and they need effective, affordable, and patient-centered treatment models. The best practices do not only stop at mere identification of the best practices but get as far as synthesizing evidence on what works and to whom, and what are the best practices. The presentation is a synthesis of the findings of a critical positioning of four peer-reviewed papers, including randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, to offer a solution to an urgent clinical question. One could build the recommendation of the best practice to treat anxiety in adults on the following statement: The implementation of standardized, 8-week courses of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) as the first-line non-pharmacotherapy and possibly, as an alternative or supplement to pharmacotherapy due to consistent and convincing evidence.

Explanation and Justification of the Best Practice

This can be corroborated by the good outcomes of the study under review that establishes the effectiveness, adaptability, and safety of MBSR in a diverse adult population and presentation models. First, MBSR does not turn out to be worse than first-line pharmacological treatment. The Level II evidence offered by the superior RCT provided by Hoge et al. (2022) indicates that the MBSR is statistically and clinically similar to a well-known SSRI, escitalopram, regarding the level of anxiety in patients with anxiety disorders. The fact that this result is critical is important as it contributes to the promotion of MBSR as a complementary therapy to a primary one, as an alternative that can provide a potent tool to the patients who do not wish to take a drug with its side effects or cannot take pharmacotherapy because of certain reasons.

Second, MBSR can be used on a subset of persons with significant medical comorbidities, which further improves the scope of practice of the therapy to the entire population of persons who are not generally unhealthy. The other Level I evidence is the meta-analysis by Fisher et al. (2023) and systematic review by Yu et al. (2023): the studies show the significant, medium, and large decrease of anxiety in patients with chronic conditions, including diabetes and cancer, with the help of MBSR. It demonstrates that MBSR is not only effective in primary anxiety, but complex anxiety, which does exist with the severe illness and is a flexible application in mental health and, in the case of integrated medical care.

Third, the best practice can be modified to the existing healthcare requirements, where healthcare services ought to be scalable and accessible. The study by Wang et al. (2023) RCT proves that a brief and adapted MBSR online program proves to be very effective compared to a waitlist control, which lowers the level of anxiety. This fact explains the need to employ MBSR in convenient approaches, which are bound to dismantle barriers related to time, space, and movement. It ensures that a larger population can have an access to this best practice and its followers who may be in far-flung areas and or have busy schedules. Finally, the consensus shows how MBSR has an excellent history of safety. In all the reviewed articles, MBSR had low negative side effects, which is the direct opposite of the usual side effects of these medications, escitalopram (Hoge et al., 2022). This is very high ratio to the extent MBSR is a low risk intervention with a high reward enabling patients become part of managing their mental health.

Conclusion

The researched information in this paper is a good endorsement that MBSR is not another wellness tool but a powerful, versatile, and harmless medication. Not just a good choice of treatment of anxiety at the first line, it is also equally effective as medication in most adult patients, and individual requirements and conditions can be met with the right to employ the option of providing this service either in real life or online. The adoption of this best practice will certainly change the treatment methods of managing patients since it will present an immensely powerful and non-pharmacological alternative in the list of treatment methods. The suggestion in favor of MBSR implementation into the clinical course is an essential move that would allow advanced practice nurses and other healthcare professionals to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based, and patient-focused care and take into account the multidimensionality of anxiety. The future research will aim at providing additional and better qualified MBSR educators and institutional support in the provision of such transformational intervention to everyone who can be helped.